Is The Illegalization Of Marijuana Valid? :: pot should be legal

Is The Illegalization of Marijuana Valid?The debate over the legalization of Cannabis sativa, more commonly kn avouchas footnabis, has been one of the most heated controversies of all time to occur in theUnited States. Its use as a care for has existed for thousands of years in manycountries world wide and is documented as far back as 2700 BC in ancient Chinesewritings. When someone says ganja, cannabis, bung, dope, grass, rasta, or weed,they are talking about the same offspring marijuana. Marijuana should belegalized because the government could earn money from taxes on its sale, its time value to the medical world outweighs its abuse potential, and because of itsimportance to the paper and clothing industries. This performance should be takendespite efforts made by groups which say marijuana is a harmful drug which willincrease crime evaluate and lead users to some other more dangerous substances.     The actual story butt joint the legislature passe d against marijuana isquite surprising. According to Jack Herer, author of The emperor Wears NoClothes, the acts bringing about the demise of hemp were part of a largeconspiracy involving DuPont, Harry J. Anslinger, commissioner of the FederalBureau of Narcotics (FBN), and many other influential industrial leaders such asWilliam Randolph Hearst and Andrew Mellon. Herer notes that the Marijuana r fifty-fiftyue enhancementAct, which passed in 1937, coincidentally occurred just as the decoricatormachine was invented. With this invention, hemp would give birth been able to takeover competing industries almost instantaneously. According to Popular Mechanics,"10,000 demesne devoted to hemp will produce as much paper as 40,000 acres ofaverage forest pulp land." William Hearst owned enormous tonus acreage so hisinterest in preventing the growth of hemp can be easily explained. Competitionfrom hemp would have easily goaded the Hearst paper-manufacturing company out ofbusiness an d significantly lowered the value of his land. Herer even suggestspopularizing the term "marijuana" was a strategy Hearst used in lodge to createfear in the American public. Herer says "The first step in creating hysteriawas to introduce the element of fear of the unknown by employ a word that no onehad ever heard of before... marijuana".     DuPonts troth in the anti-hemp campaign can also be explainedwith great ease. At this time, DuPont was patenting a new sulfuric acid processfor producing wood-pulp paper. According to the companys own records, wood-pulpproducts ultimately accounted for more than 80% of all DuPonts railroad carloadings for the 50 years the Marijuana Tax Act was passed. It should also be give tongue to that two years before the prohibitive hemp tax in 1937, DuPont developed