A Comparison of Moral Views Essay

When we excogitationualize of ancient philosophies, we immediately remember of the early Greek philosophers. Among them were Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, considered as the Fathers of Philosophy. Although they take away different views on some certain aspects, we all know that they be the most influential thinkers non only during their respective times simply today. This paper get out focus on the similarities and differences of the righteous and ethical views of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.Socrates believed that self-knowledge will meet the conditions of having a skinny life. For Socrates, knowledge and virtue are of the analogous category. If a person could non learn knowledge, he washbowl non learn virtue. With this, he argued that virtue can be taught. The unexamined life is not worth living. Socrates believed that the watch of knowledge and wisdom should always come first before some(prenominal) private interests. For him, seeking knowledge is in accordance t o ethical and moral strikeions.Socrates, considered to be the greatest philosopher of all time, assumed that priming will charter to the good life. He believed that the real gratification a person achieved was influenced in the main by doing what seems to be right. When a persons true order and function is found, he will achieve happiness. The Socratic ethics can be categorized as teleological in nature. We humans act towards the good and these actions naturally invite their purposes.Plato, like all the early philosophers, found his beliefs on ethics on virtues and human well-being. Platos beliefs on happiness diverged significantly from other philosophers views. Due to this, his time on describing his throw concept of happiness was divided. He spent lots of time criticizing the frequent beliefs of the good life. Plato also considered happiness as perfect and is not advantageously understandable since it is supported by metaphysical assumptions that appear to be unsung a nd is impossible to be understood. The focuses on Platonic ethics are the problems and difficulties of an individual, not happiness as a factor of good-living.For Aristotle, ethical knowledge is considered to be a general knowledge and not a precise knowledge. He argued that ethical knowledge is not a theoretical discipline and rather applicatory in nature. Aristotle believed that to become good, a person should have experienced the actions of life and is in accordance to fine habits.He did not believe that merely studying virtues will attract a specific individual virtuous. One should do righteous and honorable to be good and virtuous. Aristotle believed that reputation and respect only would give a person his happiness. He argued that an individual finds happiness by fulfilling his functions as a human being. For Aristotle, a humans function is to utilize what he has that everything else does not, his capacity to think or reason, or logos. A person using his ability to reason fulfills his nature as a rational soul and therefore finds his coercive happiness.For me, Aristotles ethical philosophy is the most applicable and the most practical to adapt. Unlike Socrates belief that an individual will be virtuous if he studies the virtues, Aristotle believed that one should act good to be good not by merely studying how to be good nor what is good. Plato, on the other hand, cogitate on what should not be done in order to make a persons life good. Aristotle argued that understanding what is good does not make a person good. So I think, Aristotles concept on morality stands among the three of them, just like the saying goes Actions verbalise louder than words.