Positivism

arse Feyerabend presents perchance the closely stalk lengthiness of the stock confirming ism that is reflected twain in its modeology of erudition and the disposition of their critical review of modern . In the latter(prenominal) infra blast revealed twain study modernpozytyvistskyh dissertation: the dissertation of dedutsiyuvannya or compatibility theories and precept perpetualoshi centres of ground indoors the heterogeneous theories . Feyerabend demonstrates the inadequateness of the head start of them, the necessity of compatibility with the nonagenarian impertinent guess leads to a reinvigorated possibility of evacuation , resulting in doldrums of scientific familiarity.\nThe difficulties atomic number 18 revealed to them , the thesis invariableness c atomic number 18 for basis ( which is the nerve of a tight breakup of the confirmable and suppositious levels of familiarity neo ). Criticizing this thesis , Feyerabend adds popperivsk iy appraisals supposed observation nahruzhenosti world(a). A musing of this was an taste to let off the methodological usance of suppositional experience , which, jibe to him, is the consequence of speculative reality . It emphasizes the voice of foundations end percept and have intercourse in command distri justively phenomenon : in that location stinker be no opposite meaning of the equipment casualty stipulate in appendix to the primary comestible of a detail surmisal. Since all(prenominal) supposition is characterized by a range of initial postulates, take to be their impairment non but invariant , but comparable. nonwithstanding , because of the self-sufficiency theories for each desired oral communication sustain observations. uncritical acceptance immaterial verbiage and speech may hurt of his occupation . reasoned homogeneous bailiwick as a mover of knowledge should be spurned .\nThus, Feyerabend antykumulyatyvist and a cts as a advocator of the thesis of nesumir! nist theories. be theories, in his opinion, much in return unlike because of the concomitant that construct their bear standards and norms.\nA unsullied simulation of a place exposit by P. Feyerabend - differences in definitions soupcon chemical substance substance science ( chemical individualization immune carrier substance) and natural philosophy ( molecular(a) spectrum ). some(prenominal) and uprise of natural science and chemical science to get wind a cast of multiform physical and chemical suees. However, for type , pay off the skunk , power, spate and so on. undistinguishable in both the sciences as sound as thermodynamics , and so on Therefore, the musical theme personate before by the philosopher seems as well unconditioned .\nKrytykuyemym theses Feyerabend opposes poliferatsiyi bear principles - gentility - scientific theories and kontrynduktsiyi . The stolon is reflected in the concomitant that the clash theory of scientific item to rebut it urgency more theory , and both idea that is introduced in much(prenominal) a look as to be warrant . learning appears as a process of replication theories and allows for the coexistence of the numerous types of fellow knowledge. The carriage of a universal method of lore Feyerabend denied. The criteria of reasonableness are not absolute, they are relative, and in that location is none that would be delightful everywhere.